Community
Payment fraud remains a hot topic in the financial services industry (cfr. my blog "Payment Fraud Exposed: Top Techniques and How Financial Institutions Respond" - https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2025/01/payment-fraud-exposed-top-techniques.html for more info). Despite significant investments in fraud detection and prevention, fraud continues to rise. Fraudsters are becoming increasingly sophisticated, leveraging tools like generative AI and operating in a more professionalised manner. Simultaneously, regulators are holding financial institutions increasingly accountable for customer losses resulting from fraud.
Currently, fraud is primarily tackled through two key methods:
While both are essential pillars in combating financial crime, it’s time to bring these two worlds closer— by increasing real-time interaction with customers during the payment process.
It’s important to distinguish between two types of fraud:
In ATO fraud, user interaction during the payment process isn’t helpful since the fraudster is already in control. However, dynamic risk-based authentication can play a crucial role. As soon as abnormal behavior is detected—during login, navigation, or transaction initiation—additional authentication can be triggered. For more, see my blog "Multi-Factor Authentication and Identity Fraud Detection in the Financial Services Industry" - https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/02/multi-factor-authentication-and.html for more information.
This involves evaluating various factors such as IP address, geolocation, operating system and version, browser fingerprinting, device behavior, and navigation patterns. Deviations shouldn’t result in automatic blocking—there may be legitimate reasons—but should prompt extra verification: PIN, biometric ID, personal questions, side-channel confirmation (e.g., email or call). Users can also configure user-defined self-protection settings like transaction limits or geographic/time-based restrictions.
For APP fraud, the challenge is different, as the customer is the one initiating the payment. In these cases, additional authentication doesn’t help, as it is the right customer initiating the payment. Today detection typically only occurs after the payment is submitted. This reactive approach is inefficient and often disruptive, especially in false positives.
What if we could move the fraud check forward—right to the moment the user initiates and signs the payment? This strategic shift could deliver several benefits:
To enable this “pre-scoring” mechanism at payment initiation, several adjustments are needed:
Additionally, we could explore a few other ways to collaborate with customers in avoiding fraud:
These approaches aren’t just about stopping fraud—it’s about stopping it smarter and sooner. By moving checks to the moment of payment initiation, institutions can respond faster and work in closer partnership with their customers to outsmart fraudsters.
For more insights, visit my blog at https://bankloch.blogspot.com
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Naina Rajgopalan Content Head at Freo
29 May
Igor Kostyuchenok SVP of Engineering at Mbanq
28 May
Carlo R.W. De Meijer Owner and Economist at MIFSA
Kunal Jhunjhunwala Founder at airpay payment services
27 May
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.